Some may find this easy, maybe even trivial to bid. But this is the bidding from todays expert. He obviously downgraded the South hand. 1NT is alerted as 7-11 points. But even if he had bid 2NT, the problems persist. It is not easy to select between 3NT, 3♥ and 4♥ for North. The best contract is 3NT, by the way.
I reached 4♥ like some other players which make with good luck. I play 2/1 with Lia who opened his 5-card suit. My response was 2♦, alerted as forcing by Lia's system. To the partner this looks like heart shortage and an own suit. The rebid was 2♠. This cuebid is alerted as "default bid, forcing". Then I went for 2NT, downgrading the hand. But that was not stopping North to repeat the cuebid, probably asking for a stopper and forcing to game. I reached the optimal contract. But North understandably fixed to 4♥.
This hand is a perfect example of the judgement problems you face in Bridge. I have no proper solution. Clearly, partnership understanding helps. In retrospect, I believe that 2NT is the correct response, and that it should show a balanced hand with a spade stopper and 11-12 points. North does not know about the diamond stopper then, and he wants to play in hearts anyway. But he could try 3 showing his stopper there and South might offer 3NT.
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen