Bridge Injustice
Everybody who played in a Bridge club only once knows about unjust results. Sometimes, it just happens. You do not make a reasonable game where the majority did not even find the game, or make a game, where the majority bids an unreasonable slam which needs a bad defense and a fortunate distribution to make.
This is another case, because we are playing with and against a robot. Obviously the robot is programmed to play randomly, for 2NT (described as 18-19 points with 2-4 spade cards) was passed on the other hand, and made. Moreover, that happened only once and I was selected to play against this one case. All other went down 2 in 4♥ as I did.
You can now ponder how reasonable the 4♥ bid by Lia is. Assume, Lia assumes it is good in 10% of the hands by Monte-Carlo analysis. Then it would still be a statistical mistake to bid 4♥ in 10% of all hands of this kind. It is correct to never bid it. If someone can make a rhyme on this behavior, let me know.
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen