Could have beaten Sliynk

 

But I did not beat him, due to greed. Sliynk is the IntoBridge alias of Peter Hollands, a Youtuber who creates nice content about Bridge. I met him on IntoBridge only once. On this server, you still have a chance to meet a player twice.

The hand above was bid by all players in "other results". The bidding of 3♠ is an artificial slam try which I still do not understand completely. I am playing 2/1 with Lia. The system is explained in very little detail here. I don't have more information.

Although you have 34 points in the combined hands, you cannot make 6NT because the ♦ suit does not break. Once you notice that fact, you should give up. For that to work, you need a plan to deal with it beforehand.

You have only 10 sure tricks. The ♣ could provide another one. But the ♦ look like the best bet to get two more. So cash the ♣ lead in the hand, test ♦A, cross to the table and try to finesse ♦. This does not work. Now, you can no longer make your contract if opponents play correctly.

Instead, I should have conceded West the two diamond tricks and go down once. I went down two, just like Sliynk.

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Series - The Mistakes I make at Brige

Bild
This is a nice one. You reach 4 ♥ , and West starts with the ♠8. If the trump finesse fails, you count 10 likely tricks, including one ruff of a spade at the table. But then there is also the chance to cash the ♣K for an overtrick. Easy. You are glad to combine all these options, and start a simple plan.  Cash the lead and make the finesse in hearts which fails. Another spade comes from West. When you notice that you are going to lose two trump tricks, you collect your tricks, ruffing one spade at the table at the end, and set all hopes to the club finesse which fails. One down. Everybody played like that, including me. You certainly spotted the way to make the contract? Of course. You could leave West with two trumps and throw him in after you trumped your space and cashed your  ♦ Q. Is this difficult to see at the table. Maybe. But you will definitely see West's 4 spades and hearts. When he discards the  ♦ J on  ♦ Q, the coup is very likely to work.
Mehr anzeigen

Series - The Mistakes I make at Bridge

Bild
2NT are not makeable, but if you go down only once, you are good against 2♠ by opponents. 2 ♥  would be a nice contract and just make with good play, but opponents won't let you play that easily nowadays, not even the robot Lia. The lead was ♠5, East following with the ♠Q and won in the hand. Due to severe communication issues this hand cries for a try to let the opponents play into the finesses. So, I correctly played the  ♥ A followed by a small one won by West, who cashed  ♥ K too, the followed with the ♠10  because everything else helps the declarer even more. At that point, I went for the clubs, but the diamonds actually work, playing for one honor doubleton at East. Check it out.
Mehr anzeigen

Series - The Mistakes I make in Bridge

Bild
This bidding got me stranded in 2♠ because of Acol. That's actually not bad. You cannot make it against good leads. But neither can you make 1NT, the contract you might reach by downgrading the hand to a weak 1NT. On almost all other tables, the bidding started with a strong 1NT and continued to a good heart contract for E/W by the bidding below. In that case, the "blocking" value of 1NT fails, and the direct mentioning of a spade suit works out to be superior.   But I spoiled that advantage by going down twice. Actually, I could have made the contract after the lead of ♣K. It is always tough to play 1 4-3 fit, and this is no exception. I started with a heart won by East who followed with a trump to prevent ruffs. I now can ruff only one heart at the table. The best line of play is to drive out the ♣Q now. If West takes it on the first round and returns a trump, you can play clubs to dummy and continue it. If he ducks one round, you need to find the finesse in diamonds t...
Mehr anzeigen